Why Is Organic Farming Bad – If It Is?

Why is  organic  farming bad, if it is? We have been told that  organic  farming is good for our health. Proponents have trumpeted the message that  organic  farming is good for the environment. How could it possibly be bad?

It seems that, increasingly, life is being divided into traditional and alternative. Each side claims their methods to be better than the other’s. Each tries to win people to their side. Traditional schooling fights alternative schooling. Conventional medicine fights alternative medicine. Mainstream culture fights alternative subcultures.

Farming, too, is involved in a battle, conventional farming against  organic  farming. Environmentalists and those concerned with their health assure us that  organic  farming is preferable in many ways. But others argue that  organic  farming is bad.

Why is  organic  farming bad?

Research Results

In 2002, Swiss scientists at the Research Institute for  Organic  Agriculture published in “Scientist” a highly publicized study. Their study, which covered 21 years, compared four types of farming. Two of those types were  organic  farming. The other two types were conventional farming.

Reporters quickly stated that the study proved  organic  farming was more efficient.  Organic  farming’s advocates said the study showed that  organic  farming uses 50% less energy. The facts?

1. Conventional farming is 20 percent more productive than  organic  farming.

2. Crop yields were significantly lower in  organic  farming.

3. The above two facts meant energy savings in  organic  farming were actually only about 19 percent per unit of crop produced, not 50 percent.

4. The study did not test  organic  farming against the most current methods of conventional farming. If it had, experts say, the 19 percent advantage of  organic  farming would disappear.

5. Current conventional farming matches  organic  farming when it comes to environmental advantages. Both have beneficial insects, produce less pesticide and fertilizer runoff, and reduce soil erosion.

6. Food quality was almost identical in conventional and  organic  farming. Advocates of  organic  farming had long claimed their food was far superior.

7. Current conventional farming methods produce the same or greater yields mentioned in number 1 above.

This research does not, of course, conclude that  organic  farming is bad. On the face of it, the conclusion is more that  organic  farming is not very different from current conventional farming. There most be other reasons for people believing  organic  farming is bad.

 Organic  Farming Can Kill

Many took from the Swiss study a realization that, as Cambridge chemist John Emsley said, “the greatest catastrophe the human race could face this century is not global warming, but a global conversion to ‘ organic  farming’- [where] an estimated 2 billion people would perish.”

 Organic  farming may supply food for small markets, but how can it feed starving nations? Its adversaries claim that current conventional farming is the only hope for these people. If we turn entirely to  organic  farming, they say, we will doom billions to die of starvation.

Challenging  Organic  Farming

Alex Avery, Director of Research and Education for the Hudson Institute’s Center for Global Food Issues, recently published a new book, “The Truth About  Organic  Foods.” (2006) In this book, Avery offers an unemotional look at the odd origins and unscientific basis for  organic  farming.

Nobel Peace Prize Winning Agricultural Scientist, Dr. Norman Borlaug, says about this book, “The Truth About  Organic  Foods gives consumers a thorough and straight-forward explanation of why  organic  foods offer no real health or safety benefits. More importantly, Avery communicates why  organic  farming’s lower yields and reliance on scarce  organic  fertilizers represents a potential threat to the world’s forests, wetlands and grasslands. The book offers scientifically sound evidence that more-affordable conventional foods are healthy for families and also good stewardship of nature.”

Skimming Mr. Avery’s book, one finds statements that indicate:

1.  Organic  farming started in the 1920s when a German mystic advised use of only animal manure because synthetic fertilizers had no cosmic energy.

2. Soon, the wealthy decided manure-fertilized produce was better.

3. J.I. Rodale first published his “ Organic  Gardening Magazine” in 1942, and the  organic  farming /  organic  gardening movement was named.

4. In 2007,  organic  farming advocates still have no credible science to support their beliefs.

5.  Organic  farming does not avoid pesticides. About 5 percent a vegetable’s weight is natural pesticides, some of which are cancer-causing.

6. Foods from  organic  farming have more illness-causing bacteria. (The January 2007 issue of “Consumer Reports” showed that chicken from  organic  farming has 300% more Salmonella than that from conventional farming. University studies have found more bacteria in vegetables from  organic  farming than in vegetables from conventional farming.

7. If  organic  farming, which decries synthetic fertilizer, was chosen over conventional farming, we would have a choice. We could kill millions of people to reduce global food needs, or we could sacrifice wildlife habitat in the amount of millions of square miles so we could produce more manure.

Why is  organic  farming bad? Mr. Avery believes he has the answer.

Notwithstanding Mr. Avery’s new book, I am not sure whether  organic  farming is bad or not. It is often difficult to sort through rhetoric and find fact. I do know that my forefathers had large  organic  farms. The produce was good and it was nourishing. Before I can turn my back completely on  organic  farming and  organic  gardening, I need clearer evidence. You probably want to do more research, too.

Source by Anna Hart

Recent Posts